> The wisest thing to do is 'leave well alone' If you are not capable or Use of, or inability to use, information or opinions expressed in this The Author shall not be liable forĪny direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising out of the Reliability or content of this mail/post. Kind, either expressed or implied, is made in relation to the accuracy, The information in this mail/post is supplied "as is". Only ever 2 entries available for deletion and as I know exactly what theseĮntries are they are left exactly where they are. I rarely use the registry cleaner option and when I have used it there are Useful for general cleaning of Temporary internet files, cookies, MRU's etc. The wisest thing to do is 'leave well alone' If you are not capable orĬompetent to manually edit the registry then the vast majority of registryĬleaner will simply make matters worse. > Experience has proven just the opposite: such tools simply are not safe in > registry "cleaners" that are truly safe for the general public to use. But I really don't think that there are any > time-saving diagnostic tool, as long as it's not allowed to make any > an experienced and knowledgeable technician or hobbyist can be a useful > I will concede that a good registry *scanning* tool, in the hands of > people that the risks far out-weigh the non-existent benefits. > value, but it sometimes provides a warming placebo effect), I always tell > them like treating the flu with chicken soup - there's no real medicinal > no registry "cleaner" has ever been demonstrated to do any good (think of > time they're used, but the potential for harm is always there. > Granted, most registry "cleaners" won't cause problems each and every > Given the potential for harm, it's just not worth the risk. > "clean" WinXP's registry improves a computer's performance or stability. > empirical evidence offered to demonstrate that the use of such products to > computer user, does any real good, whatsoever. > automated registry "cleaner," particularly by an untrained, inexperienced > More importantly, no one has ever demonstrated that the use of an > experience to safely configure and use any automated registry "cleaner," > maintain your registry by yourself, then you also lack the knowledge and If you lack the knowledge and experience to > Experience has shown me that such tools simply are not safe in the hands > experienced computer technicians (and/or hobbyists) to avoid them all. > automated registry "cleaners," I can only advise all but the most > Having repeatedly seen the results of inexperienced people using > he knows *exactly* what is going to happen as a result of each and every > a poorly understood automated "cleaner," unless he is fully confident that > device drivers, and the computer's configuration. > computer's hardware devices, installed software, the location of the > The registry contains all of the operating system's "knowledge" of the > your registry is knowledge and Regedit.exe.
> dire consequences of allowing an automated product to make wide-spread > changing of one or two registry entries is far less likely to have the > chainsaw when a scalpel will do the job? Additionally, the manually > key(s) and/or value(s) that are causing the problem. > far better to simply edit (after backing up, of course) only the specific
> If you do have a problem that is rooted in the registry, it would be > bogus listing of imaginary problems) that you think can be fixed by using > specific *problems* are you actually experiencing (not some program's > Why do you even think you'd ever need to clean your registry? What
#Windows registry cleaner vista free
There is no such thing as a "good" registry cleaner, free or
0 kommentar(er)
